Legal Opinion

Scholl v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 30, 2005No. 00-737CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*59 ORDER/OPINION

BASKIR, Judge.

On December 4, 2002, this Court denied the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Scholl v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 640 (2002) (Scholl I). We held that “Judge Scholl had a firm right — absent other factors which we will explore in further proceedings — to be reappointed as a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.” Id. at 640-41. Defendant’s counsel filed a motion for reconsideration three months later, on February 28, 2003. We denied the motion on March 24, 2003.

On May 27, 2003,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. In Re U.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API