Scholl v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*59 ORDER/OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
On December 4, 2002, this Court denied the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Scholl v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 640 (2002) (Scholl I). We held that “Judge Scholl had a firm right — absent other factors which we will explore in further proceedings — to be reappointed as a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.” Id. at 640-41. Defendant’s counsel filed a motion for reconsideration three months later, on February 28, 2003. We denied the motion on March 24, 2003.
On May 27, 2003,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- In Re U.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.