Legal Opinion

Kathleen Mack v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1985No. 83-2285PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order of the District Court granting summary judgment to defendant, finding plaintiff’s claim for damages allegedly caused by the insertion of a Daikon Shield barred by the Arizona two-year statute of limitations, A.R.S. § 12-542.

We review the District Court’s decision as to the interpretation of the applicable Arizona law de novo, In re McLinn, 739 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), and affirm.

The well-reasoned opinion of the District Court appears at 573 F.Supp. 149 (1983), and we write briefly in support of the trial court’s decision.

At one point in her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. MacK v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
  4. Klempka v. GD Searle and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  5. Doe v. Miles Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API