Legal Opinion

Childs v. Haussecker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1998No. 97-0231PublishedCited by 331 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHankinson, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, ENOCH, SPECTOR, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, joined.

In these two causes we address the correct formulation and application of the discovery rule in the latent occupational disease context. In reaching that formulation, we balance our concern that diligent plaintiffs be able to pursue meritorious claims with the need to prevent Texas courts and defendants from being inundated with premature or speculative claims. Accordingly, we adopt the following rule in latent occupational disease cases: a cause of action accrues whenever a plaintiffs symptoms manifest…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by331 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re: Karen A. Briscoe Alfred Lara Wanda T. Kizer Debra Alexander Rhonda Allen Mary Green Glenda D. Abbott and Leslie BalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004

326 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API