Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Klempka v. GD Searle and Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1991No. Civ. 4-86-579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Karen Ann Klempka 1 brought this action against defendant G.D. Searle & Company (Searle) for personal injuries she alleges were caused by Searle’s Cu-7 intrauterine device (IUD) contraceptive. Diversity jurisdiction is alleged.

The complaint includes claims of negligence, strict liability, fraud, misrepresentation, breach of express and implied warranties, violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 325D.13, 325D.15, 325F.67 and 325F.69, and loss of services, consortium, and other damages.

Now before the court are several motions:

1) by Searle…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. John A. Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
  2. Karen Ann Klempka v. G.D. Searle and Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
  4. Medalen v. Tiger Drylac U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API