Doe v. Miles Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs/appellants Jane Doe and her son, A. Doe, contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants/appellees on statute of limitations grounds. We disagree and therefore affirm.
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the parties against whom summary judgment was entered and independently review any questions of law relating to the statute of limitations defense. Owens v. City of Phoenix, 180 Ariz. 402, 405, 884 P.2d 1100, 1103 (App.1994); Zuck v. State, 159 Ariz. 37, 39, 764 P.2d 772, 774…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jane Doe One v. GarciaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- Pallen v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998