Legal Opinion

McLINN v. FJORD

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1984No. 82-3644PublishedCited by 369 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

739 F.2d 1395

1985 A.M.C. 2408

In The Matter of the Complaint of William McLINN, as Owner

of the F/V FJORD, etc.

In the Matter of the Complaint of Gilbert Jack JOHNSON and

Jack Stewart Johnson, as owners of the F/V

SUPERSONIC, etc.

Frank CHURCHILL, as the Informal Administrator of the Estate

of Patrick Churchill, and Dale Carlough,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

The F/V FJORD etc., et al., Defendants,

and

The F/V SUPERSONIC, her engines, tackle, apparel,

appliances, equipment, apparatus and furniture; Gilbert

Johnson, part owner and/or operator of said F/V SUPERSONIC;

Jack Johnson, part owner of said F/V…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited130 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by369 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

364 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API