Legal Opinion

MacK v. AH Robins Co., Inc.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 30, 1983No. Civ. 82-098-TUC-ACMPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

MARQUEZ, District Judge.

The defendant, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 56 and Local Rules of Practice ll(i). Hearing was had on June 6, 1983 after which the court took the matter under advisement.

Plaintiff asserts that her cause of action did not accrue until December of 1981 when she learned of the defective nature of the defendant’s product through a newspaper article. And therefore her complaint, filed February of 1982, is within Arizona’s two-year period.

Defendant asserts that the cause…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. McA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gaither v. City Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Hickman v. GroverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Kathleen Mack v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API