Legal Opinion
In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 29, 2002No. Master File IP-00-9373-C-B/S, Individual Case IP-01-5355-C-B/S, IP-01-5256-C-B/S, IP-01-5258-C-B/SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS GROUNDS
BARKER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This entry addresses summary judgment motions filed by Defendant Bridge-stone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC (“Firestone”) in three of the personal injury/wrongful death cases pending in this Multidistrict Litigation. 1 Firestone asserts, as the basis for these motions, that the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. The first two cases, Mancuso and Ferrer, are governed by California law. The last case, Wilkinson, is governed by the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Elizabeth C.O. Bellaver v. Quanex Corp./nichols-HomeshieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Carpenter Co. v. BASF SEDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- In Re bridgestone/firestone, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Fayard v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Santangelo v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003