Legal Opinion

Young v. Carlson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1954No. Civ. 16102PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Gaston Young, was injured when he was struck by an automobile operated by defendant, John W. Carlson. In this action for damages the plaintiff proffered properly drafted instructions on last clear chance. The trial court refused to give such instructions. The jury brought in a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on that verdict. His sole contention is that the instructions on last clear chance should have been given, and that it was prejudicial error to refuse to give them.

It is, of course, “the duty of the court to instruct on every theory of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Donchin v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Ng v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Di Sandro v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API