Legal Opinion

Hoy v. Tornich

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11290PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him for damages alleged to have been caused by his negligent operation of an automobile. The answer denied that the defendant was negligent and, as a separate defense, alleged that the plaintiff’s injuries were “proximately caused by the negligence of said Hugo Eric Hoy in this, that . . . said Hugo Eric Hoy carelessly and negligently ran directly in front of the said automobile . . . and . . . carelessly and negligently failed and neglected to avoid said accident and said injuries.”

At a point on the highway between…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Wiley v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API