Hoy v. Tornich
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him for damages alleged to have been caused by his negligent operation of an automobile. The answer denied that the defendant was negligent and, as a separate defense, alleged that the plaintiff’s injuries were “proximately caused by the negligence of said Hugo Eric Hoy in this, that . . . said Hugo Eric Hoy carelessly and negligently ran directly in front of the said automobile . . . and . . . carelessly and negligently failed and neglected to avoid said accident and said injuries.”
At a point on the highway between…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Wiley v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.