Di Sandro v. Griffith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence in a personal injury action, involving an intersection automobile accident, required the giving of an instruction on the last clear chance doctrine. Appellants, the plaintiffs in the action, proposed such an instruction which the trial court refused to give, and this refusal is assigned as prejudicial error in their appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the respondents, the defendants in the action.
Granted the existence of substantial evidence, conflicting or otherwise, in support of each of the elements…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Garcia v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bishop v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Spurrell v. SpurrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.