Legal Opinion

Donchin v. Guerrero

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1995No. B081043PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

In this dog attack case we conclude the injured plaintiff raised a triable issue whether defendant landlord knew about the vicious propensities of his tenant’s two rottweilers. The landlord filed a declaration denying he possessed this knowledge. We hold plaintiff introduced sufficient evidence casting doubt on the landlord’s credibility to create a triable issue whether he did know the dogs were dangerous. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in the landlord’s favor.

Facts and Proceedings Below

According to the allegations of the complaint and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. KimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Eric Gross and Adrianne Gross v. Elizabeth Turner and Antonio FloresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. Hamburg v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Chee v. Amanda Goldt Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Martinez v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Conley v. MatthesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API