Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Steinberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 2005No. Misc. Docket AG No. 6, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C. J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the “Commission”), through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed against Andrew M. Steinberg, the respondent, a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, in which it was alleged that he violated Rule 8.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters) 2 and Rule 8.4 (Misconduct), 3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Appendix: Rules of Professional Conduct of the Maryland Rules, see Maryland Rule 16-812. We referred the matter, pursuant to Rule 16-752(a), 4 to the Honorable Eric M. Johnson of the Circuit Court for Montgomery…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GubermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API