Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Parsons
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 2, 1987No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) Nos. 34 & 35, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COUCH, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed petitions for disciplinary action against Charles C. Parsons and William Reback, 1 alleging violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), (5), and (6), 2 6-101(A)(3), 3 and 7-102(A)(5). 4 We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV 9 b, to Judge Bruce C. Williams of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting a hearing, Judge Williams made the following findings with respect to each petition:
“FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
“This case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Surratt v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.