Legal Opinion
Beck v. Stratton
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 2017No. B270826APublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLLINS, J.
—The labor commissioner awarded respondent Anthony Stratton approximately $6,000 in unpaid wages and penalties against his former employer, appellant Thomas E. Beck. Beck unsuccessfully appealed the award to the superior court under Labor Code section 98.2, subdivision (a). Stratton then moved for attorney’s fees under Labor Code section 98.2, subdivision (c), 58 days later. Beck opposed the motion as untimely, because Stratton filed it after the 30-day deadline applicable to fee motions in limited civil cases. Stratton maintained the motion was timely because it was filed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lolley v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nishiki v. Danko Meredith, APC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Stratton v. Beck, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bell v. NuSil Technology, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- County of Humboldt v. App. Div.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Dedication and Everlasting Love etc. v. City of El MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.