Legal Opinion

Nishiki v. Danko Meredith, APC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 1, 2018No. A147733PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulman, J.*

*887When an employee resigns without notice, California law requires the employer to pay all wages within 72 hours. ( Lab. Code § 202, subd. (a)1 .) If the employer willfully fails to do so, the employee's wages continue as a penalty from that due *631date until the wages are paid, for up to 30 days. (§ 203.) This case considers an award of these "waiting time" penalties, as well as an award of attorney fees to the employee for the employer's unsuccessful appeal. (§ 98.2.) *888Taryn Nishiki, a former employee of defendant Danko Meredith P.C.,2 filed a complaint with the California Labor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stratton v. Beck, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Karen Hartstein v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. AGK Sierra de Montserrat, L.P. v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Baer v. TedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30District Court, S.D. California · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API