Ghirardo v. Antonioli
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
—This case demonstrates the complexity, uncertainty, and sometimes unexpected results of California’s usury law. The owners of undeveloped real property sold it to a prospective developer and received a promissory note and deed of trust to the property. The new owner sold it to another buyer, who purchased it subject to that note and deed of trust. No one contends either of these transactions was usurious. A payment dispute arose, and the new buyer sued the first seller to prevent foreclosure. After extensive negotiations, the parties agreed to a debt restructuring. The buyer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Security Pacific National Bank v. WozabCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. LouisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by303 opinions
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Board of Administration v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.