Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
This case presents two issues: first, whether the “one additional hour of pay” provided for in Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage or premium pay subject to a three-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 338) or a penalty subject to a one-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340); second, whether a trial court, conducting a de novo trial, can consider additional wage claims not presented in the administrative proceeding before the state Labor Commissioner. We conclude that the remedy provided in Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage or…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by293 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.