Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2007No. S140308PublishedCited by 293 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

This case presents two issues: first, whether the “one additional hour of pay” provided for in Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage or premium pay subject to a three-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 338) or a penalty subject to a one-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340); second, whether a trial court, conducting a de novo trial, can consider additional wage claims not presented in the administrative proceeding before the state Labor Commissioner. We conclude that the remedy provided in Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage or…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by293 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API