Lolley v. Campbell
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
The issue we decide is whether the superior court may assess attorney fees against an employer who unsuccessfully appeals an administrative order to pay wages if the employee cannot afford counsel and is represented without charge by the Labor Commissioner. The Court of Appeal held that attorney fees could not be awarded in such circumstances, because an indigent employee who is represented by the Labor Commissioner has not “incurred” attorney fees within the meaning of Labor Code section 98.2, subdivision (c). We disagree and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
I
In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.