Legal Opinion

Lolley v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2002No. S093597PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

The issue we decide is whether the superior court may assess attorney fees against an employer who unsuccessfully appeals an administrative order to pay wages if the employee cannot afford counsel and is represented without charge by the Labor Commissioner. The Court of Appeal held that attorney fees could not be awarded in such circumstances, because an indigent employee who is represented by the Labor Commissioner has not “incurred” attorney fees within the meaning of Labor Code section 98.2, subdivision (c). We disagree and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

I

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API