Legal Opinion

Bell v. NuSil Technology, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00061Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHAN BELL, individually, and on No. 1:20-cv-00061-NONE-JLT behalf of other members of the general 12 public similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1447

13 Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 3) 14 v. 15 NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the court is plaintiff Nathan Bell’s motion to remand this wage-and-hour putative 19 class action to the Kern County Superior Court, where it was originally filed. (Doc. No. 3.) 20 Plaintiff’s former employers,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Guglielmino v. McKee Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API