Legal Opinion

Gompf v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2005No. 04-55PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

A jury convicted Jason Gompf of possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, marijuana, with intent to deliver, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-T-(LexisNexis 2008). Prior to trial, Mr. Gompf filed two motions to suppress the evidence and statements obtained by police during an encounter with him at his place of residence. The district court denied both motions, and Mr. Gompf appeals his conviction claiming the evidence should have been suppressed. Finding no error in the district court's denial of the suppression motions, we affirm Mr. Gompf's conviction.

ISSUES

[12] Mr.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Garvin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Custer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McKenney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API