Legal Opinion

Custer v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2006No. 05-136PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Raymond D. Custer pled guilty to one count of possession of marijuana and one count of possession of methamphetamine while reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He claims the district court should have granted his motion to suppress because he was seized in violation of Article I, § 4 of the Wyoming Constitution and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitu tion. We conclude Mr. Custer did not properly present his state constitutional argument to the district court and, consequently, we decline to consider…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Garvin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kunselman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Flood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Feeney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lovato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API