Legal Opinion

Garvin v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2007No. S-07-0101, S-07-0102PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶1] Appellants Melissa Garvin and Mare A. Lockwood entered conditional pleas of guilty to the charge of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. They reserved the right to appeal the district court's denial of their respective motion to suppress the marijuana evidence discovered in Gar-vin's rental vehicle following a traffic stop. In this consolidated appeal, both Garvin and Lockwood claim the evidence should have been suppressed as the fruit of Garvin's unlawful detention under both the United States and Wyoming Constitutions. Finding the detention was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Cameron Clayton Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Feeney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lovato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Carl Wayne Allgier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API