Legal Opinion
Rideout v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 2005No. 04-260, 04-261PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] In these consolidated cases, Jason Carl Rideout (J.C. Rideout) and his brother, Michael Scott Rideout (Scott Rideout) (collectively referred to as the Defendants) appeal a district court order denying their motions to suppress marijuana and associated paraphernalia seized from J.C. Rideout’s residence after police officers effectuated a war-rantless entry to secure the residence after detecting the odor of marijuana emanating from the residence and from Scott Rideout’s person. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] The Defendants filed virtually identical appellate briefs. The issue…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FergusonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- OPERATION SAVE AMERICA v. City of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Evans v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
- State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.