Legal Opinion

Silverton v. Marler

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1964No. 341PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

This was a suit for injuries suffered by appellant, Frances Silverton, when she slipped and fell on ice which had accumulated near the entrance to Tok Lodge, at Tok, Alaska, where she had been a paying guest. The first question on this appeal is which statute of limitations governs appellant’s claim: the six-year statute for actions on contract 1 , which appellant contends' is applicable; or the two-year statute for tort actions 2 , which the court below held was controlling.

Appellant argues that the words “not arising on contract” in the two-year statute of limitations mean…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Leege v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hoffman v. WairDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
  4. Goodman v. FernaldOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Yudin v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Groseth v. NessAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Northern Lights Motel, Inc. v. SweaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API