Legal Opinion
Yudin v. Carroll
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided December 2, 1944No. Civil Action 89PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
On October 9, 1944, the defendants, Frank J. Carroll and Gilbert H. Wootten, executors of the estate of Charles A. Rockafellow, deceased, who are the only defendants that have been served with summons, filed their motion to dismiss the alleged cause of action.
Counsel for plaintiff and the defendants asked permission to file written briefs and arguments on the questions presented which permission was granted and the briefs and arguments were duly filed and have been carefully considered by the court.
The allegations of the complaint will be referred to in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Polk Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Jones v. Hyatt Legal Services (In Re Dow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Silverton v. MarlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Nave v. Bell, U.S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Caribbean Const. Corp. v. Kennedy Van Saun Mfg. & Eng. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.