Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Appellant instituted this action in the superior court where it sought recovery of damages resulting from appellee’s purported failure to properly repair a boiler. Appellant based its complaint on separate causes of action sounding both in tort (negligence) and in contract (breach of an implied warranty). After trial by a jury a general verdict in appellee’s favor was returned and a judgment dismissing appellant’s causes of action were thereafter entéred.
Appellant contends that a new trial is required because of the trial court’s failure to give any “limiting”…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Milau Associates, Inc. v. North Avenue Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Des Jardins v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.