Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Wair
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 25, 1961No. Civ. 7352PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
Parties and Jurisdiction
Each of the defendants, Donald Wair (Wair), and Morris Goldstein (Gold-stein), have moved for an order of dismissal in the above-entitled action (F.R. Civ.P. 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A.). Wair’s motion is based upon three grounds:(a) The claim alleged in the amended complaint is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. ORS 12.110 (2 years);(b) The matters and the claim alleged have been heretofore fully adjudicated in favor of Wair and against plaintiff; and(c) The amended complaint fails to allege facts or to state an enforceable claim against Wair…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Kenney v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- W. T. Jackson and Joe Solis v. William DukeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Russell M. Smith v. John J. Cremins, Jr., John F. Mahon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- American Commuters Association, Inc. v. Arthur Levitt, Individually and as Comptroller of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Feliciano v. Autoridad de Acueductos y AlcantarilladosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1966
- Gaito v. StraussDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Clark v. MusickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.