Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Fernald

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The complaint herein contains the following allegations:

“I

That at the date of the accident and injury hereinafter mentioned Josephine Harker Fernald, deceased, was the owner of that certain store building located on Lot one (1) Block eleven (11), City of Portland, Oregon, known as 223 First Street (1007 and 1009 new numbers) in the City of Portland, Oregon. That on November 10,1933 Josephine Harker Fernald died, and defendants John Bailey Fernald and Chester Bailey Fernald are her heirs at law and now own or possess some interest in said real property.

n

That during all the times herein…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Baird v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ashmun v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Mayer v. Thompson-Hutchison BuildIng Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Silverton v. MarlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API