Legal Opinion

Leege v. Martin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1963No. 256PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellees, commercial fishermen, were convicted by a jury in district magistrate court of fishing in a closed area. By statute in 1959 this offense was made a misdemeanor with penalties of fine and imprisonment. 1 In addition, the statute provided for forfeiture of commercial fishing licenses. 2 In 1961 the legislature enacted chapter 112 which amended the license forfeiture provision by adding the sentence: “Any forfeiture under this section is effective immediately upon conviction and no stay pending appeal may be granted.” 3

Appellees appealed their convictions to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Flynn v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Alex v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API