Legal Opinion

Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2013No. 6804 S-13675/S-13745PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Shareholders of a closely held corporation brought a derivative suit against a shareholder-director and the corporation's former attorneys for fiduciary fraud, fraudulent conveyance, legal malpractice, and civil conspiracy. After an evidentiary hearing, the superior court ruled all the claims were time-barred. We affirm the superior court's dismissal of most claims, but reverse its dismissal of two claims and remand those claims for further proceedings.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

1. Gefre, Beck, and Steffen form Island Fuel (Petro Alaska).

Nicholas Gefre,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  4. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Blake J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services Philip Kaufman John Does 1-10 and Alexa J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024
  2. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Christianson v. Conrad-Houston InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API