Legal Opinion

State v. Feehely

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1976No. 75-4651, CA 6105; 75-4648, CA 6106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Defendants appeal their conviction of criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207. 1 They assign as error (1) the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence of a search and seizure; (2) the admission of certain evidence; and (3) the trial court’s failure to give requested instructions.

For ten days prior to September 13, 1975, police officers had been maintaining surveillance of defendant Waldrip’s residence. Police Officer Guth sought a search warrant by making a recorded telephone call to a magistrate in which he supplied the following information. He was engaged in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ElkOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  3. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. State v. MetlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. QuartierOregon Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. CollicottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API