Legal Opinion

State v. Crockett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1978No. Case B38-381, CA 9526PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.

Defendant was charged with theft in the second degree. ORS 164.045. She moved to suppress items seized as a result of a warantless search of her automobile after it had been stopped by a police officer. The motion was granted and the state appeals.

The defendant has effectively conceded that the stop was valid by not raising any substantial claim that it was invalid. Her argument that the search was invalid rests on an assumption that the stop was lawful. The officer stopped defendant and her companion on the basis of a radio bulletin issued by the police dispatcher. The dispatcher had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. FeehelyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. NormileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API