Legal Opinion

Hamburg v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1991No. 90-188PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice, Retired.

Appellant A1 Hamburg appeals from a forgery conviction. The issues stated by appellant are:

I

Did the proof at trial demonstrate that defendant committed the crime of forgery?

II

Was the defendant tried before a jury which was impartial and free of bias and prejudice?

III

Was defendant deprived of effective assistance of counsel?

IY

Did the trial court commit other prejudicial and reversible error?

V

Do the terms of defendant’s sentence violate his rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the laws of the State of Wyoming?

We affirm in part, reverse in part…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. KasabuckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Meerscheidt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API