State v. Hughes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
After being indicted for criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207, defendant moved to suppress evidence seized in his home during a search pursuant to a search warrant. The trial court granted the motion to suppress. The state appeals pursuant to ORS 138.060(3). We affirm.
The affidavit in application for the search warrant was executed by Officer Hostick. It purported to recite reports made to him by two citizen informants about suspicious items they had observed in defendant’s house. The motion to suppress contended: (1) the affidavit contained inaccurate statements about what the informants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. TackerOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. DunavantOregon Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AgeeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. NyceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.