State v. Quartier
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
— It is contended by counsel for defendant that the search-warrant was void because the affidavit on which it was based was insufficient, in that it failed to state facts as required by Section 1854, Or. L., and by Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution of Oregon, from which the magistrate could make his findings of probable cause. It is further claimed by defendant that the search-warrant was void for the reason that no deposition in writing was taken by the magistrate or subscribed to by the complainant or witnesses in his behalf as required by Section 1855, Or. L. It is also contended…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- McBride v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- State v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
- United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. DuffyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Siverson v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.