Legal Opinion
State v. Tidyman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 17, 1977No. C76 05 06161, CA 6920PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for disseminating obscene material in violation of ORS 167.087. The defendant makes several assignments of error.
I. INSUFFICIENCY OF THE SEARCH WARRANT
The defendant asserts that the affidavit for the search warrant is insufficient to allege probable cause and that the warrant does not describe the property to be seized with sufficient particularity.
A. Allegations of Probable Cause
The affidavit is lengthy and we summarize its allegations rather than burden these pages with its entirety. The affidavit, dated April 2, 1976, preliminarily recites…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. NulphCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. DornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.