Legal Opinion

State v. Collicott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 1982No. C80-11 33999, CA A20816PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*607JOSEPH, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance.1 He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found at his residence as the result of a warrantless search. Although the issue framed by the parties is whether there were exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless search, the primary question is at what time probable cause arose.

On September 16, 1980, Deputy Sayler of the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office received a report from another deputy that asked him to contact two informants, Julia Ems and Janette Stockton,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. ClomanOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Salem Decorating Center, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API