Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 11, 1953No. 4651_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
After a representation hearing on the petition of Oil Workers International Union, CIO, pursuant to Section 9(c)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., the National Labor Relations Board found that Stanolind Oil and Gas Company’s Elk Basin repressuring plant employees constituted an appropriate bargaining unit within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act. And after an election under Section 9(c)(1)(B) in which the Union was successful, the Union was certified as the collective bargaining representative for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Banco Credito Y Ahorro Ponceno v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dewey Portland Cement Company, Division of Martin Marietta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burroughs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971