Legal Opinion

Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1947No. 658PublishedCited by 518 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

The question presented by this case is whether foremen are entitled as a class to the rights of self-organization, collective bargaining, and other concerted activities as assured to employees generally by the National Labor Relations Act. The case grows out of conditions in the automotive industry, and so far as they are important to the legal issues here the facts are simple.

*487The Packard Motor Car Company employs about 32,000 rank-and-file workmen. Since 1937 they have been represented by the United Automobile Workers of America affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations. These…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Skinner & Kennedy Stationery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Packard Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by518 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

513 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API