Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Dewey Portland Cement Company, Division of Martin Marietta Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1964No. 7620_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order issued June 5, 1963, the substance of which would require respondent to bargain collectively with United Cement, Lime and Gypsum Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, as the exclusive bargaining representative of the company’s production and maintenance employees. Respondent admits its refusal to bargain but denies the commission of an unfair labor practice under section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act,. 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., through assertion that the Board did not validly determine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Ideal Laundry and Dry Cleaning Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Merle D. Vincent, Jr., Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Gold Spot Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Herald Co. v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Furr's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. St. Anthony Hospital Systems v. National Labor Relations Board, and St. Anthony's Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API