Denman v. Broderick
California Supreme Court
Petition in the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate to the auditor of the City and County of San Francisco, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The petitioner claims to be a member of the board of election commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco under a certain act of the legislature approved March 28, 1895. (Stats. 1895, p. 341.) He presented his demand for a month’s salary as such commissioner to the respondent, auditor of said city and count)7, and requested him to draw his warrant for the amount of such salary upon the treasurer of said city and county. The respondent refused to draw such warrant on the ground that said act is unconstitutional; whereupon the petitioner presented his petition to this court for a writ…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cody v. MurpheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Desmond v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Earle v. Board of Education of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by23 opinions
- Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. University of Utah v. CandlandUtah Supreme Court · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.