Legal Opinion

Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2004No. S122923, S122865PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

We assumed jurisdiction in these original writ proceedings to address an important but relatively narrow legal issue—whether a local executive official who is charged with the ministerial duty of enforcing a state *1067statute exceeds his or her authority when, without any court having determined that the statute is unconstitutional, the official deliberately declines to enforce the statute because he or she determines or is of the opinion that the statute is unconstitutional.

In the present case, this legal issue arises out of the refusal of local officials in the City and…

2Cases cited123 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of Colusa Indian Community v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API