Cody v. Murphey
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
— This is an original proceeding for a writ of mandate against the defendant, county auditor of the county of Mono, to compel him, as such auditor, to issue his warrant on the county treasurer of said county, in favor of the plaintiff who is the sheriff of said county, for the sum of $333.33 as and for his salary as such sheriff for the month of April, 1891.
Under the County Government Act of 1883, Mono County became a county of the thirty-fifth class.
Section 197 of the act of 1883 as amended in 1885 fixed the salaries of the county officers of counties of the thirty-fifth class, and by that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People ex rel. Miller v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Thomason v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Longan v. County of SolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- County of Los Angeles v. HurlbutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re FinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.