Desmond v. Dunn
California Supreme Court
Application for writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
The plaintiff alleges that on the 1st day of J une-, 1880, he presented to the defendant, who then was, and still is, the *246Auditor of the City and County of San Francisco, for allowance, a demand on the treasury of said city and county, which it was the duty of said Auditor to allow, under an act of the Legislature, entitled, “ An Act to provide for the organization, incorporation, and government of merged and consolidated cities and counties of more than one hundred thousand population, pursuant to the provisions of § 7, art. xi, of the Constitution of this State. Approved…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Devine v. Board of CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- State ex rel. Wise v. ButtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Kahn v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Staude v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Denman v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Martin v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.