Legal Opinion

Woodall v. Darst

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1912PublishedCited by 100 opinions

Petition for mandamus by A. W. Woodall to compel the issue of an Auditor’s warrant under a legislative appropriation, to which John S. Darst, State Auditor demurred.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the auditor to issue his warrant in favor of relator upon the treasurer for $2,500 which was appropriated out of the state revenues by an act of the extraordinary session of the Legislature which convened February 23, 1907. The appropriation to him was included in the general appropriation act, entitled, “A BILL making appropriations of public money to pay general charges upon the treasury.” So much of the act as relates to the appropriation made to relator reads as follows: “For A. W. Woodall, member of Co. M., 2nd Regiment West…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Sharpless v. Mayor of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Adkins v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Appalachian Power Co. v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. County Court of Marion County v. DemusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Cashman v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Booten v. PinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API