Legal Opinion

State ex rel. University of Utah v. Candland

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1909No. 2057PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Application for mandamus by tbe state on tbe relation of tbe Utah University against W. G. Candland and others, constituting tbe State Board of Land .Commissioners.

1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.

Tbis is an original application to tbis court by wbicb tbe University of Ut-ab, hereafter designated plaintiff, prays for a writ of mandate against tbe State Board of Land Commissioners to compel said board, hereafter styled defendant, to comply with tbe provisions of a certain act, designated as chapter 124, passed by tbe legislature of the State of Utah in 1909. (Laws Utah 1909, p. 335.) An alternative writ was duly issued, to wbicb tbe defendant appeared by filing a general demurrer tp tbe application for a writ. Tbe application for a writ is based upon tbe provisions of tbe act aforesaid,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. McNeal v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Law v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Buchanan v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API