Legal Opinion

Jackson County v. Wehren

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 2003No. 00-01180 and 99-01486; A114211PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Faced with conflicting medical opinions as to whether claimant’s recurrent neck and shoulder pain resulted in major part from an earlier compensable injury, the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) accepted the opinion that it did. On judicial review, employer argues that the accepted opinion was not based on a sufficiently complete medical history and that it did not adequately evaluate the relative contribution of all potentially causative events. We review legal issues for errors of law and factual issues for substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8)(a), (c). Substantial evidence supports a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Barnett v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Bluemer v. Southland IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Bowen v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Minor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Minor)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. SAIF Corp. v. MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API