Legal Opinion

Uris v. State Compensation Department

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1967PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action under the former Workmen’s Compensation Law. After the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff the court entered judgment n.o.v. for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

*422The sole question is whether there was sufficient evidence of causal relation between the occurrence testified to by the plaintiff and his injury to carry the case to the jury.

The facts are as follows: On September 6, 1963, plaintiff, then a student at Portland State College, was employed at Reed College moving books from the old to the new library. His job required him to load the books on a three-tiered cart…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crowley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Ritter v. SivilsOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Howerton v. PfaffOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lovely's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Larson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Radica v. Carolina MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Chouinard v. Health VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API