Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Fred Meyer Stores

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 2005No. 03-01249; A126344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, determining that she failed to establish the compensability of her left shoulder impingement and the arthroscopic surgery that she had to correct the problem. We review legal issues for errors of law and factual issues for substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8)(a), (c). Substantial evidence supports a finding when the record, viewed as a whole, permits a reasonable person to make that finding. ORS 183.482(8)(c); Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292, 295, 787 P2d 884 (1990). We conclude that the board’s findings are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Jackson County v. WehrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. ObieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Lowells v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Vigor Industrial, LLC v. AyresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API